It found that the queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985, which attempted to retrospectively abolish native title rights, was not valid according to the racial discrimination act 1975. In turn, it relied on developments at international law that had given rise to commonwealth antidiscrimination laws. The term mabo, as used in the media reports, refers to all issues relating to the australian high court judgement in the mabo v. Oct 03, 2016 the selden society 2016 lecture series continues with the hon margaret white ao on mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1. Queensland, a case that was litigated over for almost a decade in the australian high court, this case was a monumental step for indigenous people in australia. Memory of the world register nomination form australia the mabo case manuscripts part a essential information the personal papers of edward koiki mabo are held alongside legal and historical materials relating to the mabo case. Mabo v state of queensland 1992 66aljr408 the recognition of native title by the full court of the high court of australia in mabo v queensland 3 june 1992 is an important development in the relationship between australias indigenous people and its european settlers. Queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985 qld people. When he was growing up, life in the torres strait islands was strictly regulated with laws made by the queensland government. Mabo v state of queensland no 2 university of queensland.
The selden society is hosting a lecture on the subject of mabo v the state of queensland as part of the 2016 lecture series. Eddie mabo v the state of queensland susan burton phillips 1. The high court is the highest court in australias judicial system. Introduction after a decade of litigation, on 3 june 1992 justice was finally accorded to the meriam people who occupy the murray islands, with the high courts findings in mabo v. The majority judgments in full are the largest, and perhaps also the plainest in appearance, of australias key constitutional documents. Five things you should know about the mabo decision the. Queensland that would have merged the public and private spheres. Eddie mabo was an indigenous activist whose efforts. The mabo case initially a revolution australian law legal. Eddie koiki mabo was a torres strait islander who believed australian laws on land ownership were wrong and fought to change them.
Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo no 22 was the first occasion in which a. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23, 1992 175 clr 1 1992. To establish its long term consequences may require considerable litigation, or. Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading.
Mabo v queensland no 2 commonly known as mabo was a landmark australian court case which was decided by the high court of australia on june 3, 1992. The courts judgment on the 3rd of june, 1992, after a decade of litigation, the high court ruled that the land title of the indigenous peoples, the aborigines and torres strait. To maintain the pages relevant and succinct, we have a dedicated mabo page for each one of the subjects in which it is covered, which only contains the issues relevant to that subject. Jun 02, 2017 the 1992 mabo decision led to the native title act 1993 which created a framework that recognises aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples have rights to, and interests in, certain land because of their traditional laws and customs. The high court held that the doctrine of terra nullius, which imported all laws of england to a new land, did not apply in circumstances where there were inhabitants present if those inhabitants had been regarded at the time as uncivilized. Mabo and the discursive constitution of the australian nation. Free essays on mabo v queensland no 2 case brief brainia. The mabo decision was named after eddie mabo, the man who challenged the australian legal system and fought for recognition of the rights of aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples as the traditional owners of their land. It is short for mabo and others v queensland no 2 1992. The high court rejected the doctrine of terra nullius, in favour of the common law doctrine of aboriginal title, and overruled milirrpum v nabalco pty ltd 1971, a contrary decision of the supreme court of the northern territory. Mabo v queensland number 1 in 1985, while the mabo case was proceeding, the queensland government sought to circumvent the issue of whether rights of indigenous peoples survived colonisation. Your use of this heinonline pdf indicates your acceptance. The mabo decision, and the full text of the decision in mabo.
The legal decision was made by the high court on 3 june 1992. This weekend marks two decades since the high courts historic mabo ruling. Mabo v queensland no 2 queensland university of technology. Queensland no 2 leading cases of the common law mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1 presented by the hon margaret white ao selden society australian chapter cordially invites you to lecture four in our 2016 lecture series thursday 22 september 2016, 5. Leading cases of the common law mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1 will be presented by the hon margaret white ao. Foundations of the legal system, 2nd ed, melbourne, oxford university press, 2009, pp. However, the high court ruled in 1988 mabo v the state of queensland no. Mabo and others and the state of queensland was a high court native title, constitutional and real property law case involving a series of claims by the meriam peoples for native title of the murray islands a series of islands annexed to the colony of queensland. On 3 june, 1992, the high court of australia ruled that the doctrine of terra nullius was a legal fiction and that the native people had good title which predated european conquest.
Mabo v queensland 1988 hca 69 mabo v queensland 08 december 1988 1988 hca 69 08 december 1988 mason c. Mabo ruling, 20 years on abc news australian broadcasting. June 2011 comments off on mabo v queensland no 2 categories. Mabo is a massive and prolific case which is discussed in many of the subjects offered on this site. Mabo v queensland no 2 commonly known as mabo was a landmark high court of australia decision in 1992 recognising native title in australia for the first time. The mabo case the mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius land belonging to noone on which british claims to possession of australia were based. Attorneygeneral nsw v brown, 1847, australian court case, brennan, justice gerard, canberra, common law, crown land, doctrine of tenure, high court judgement, high court of australia, high court of australia, mabo judgement, privy council, queensland government, sovereignty. The mabo case the mabo case commenced in the late 70s about an aborigine eddie mabo who fought for his land on murray island, part of the torres strait. Mabo v queensland was a landmark high court of australia decision in 1992 recognising native title in australia for the first time. Work from home more effectively with video conferences and updates. This entry was posted in case pages, decided cases, opinions and tagged mabo v queensland no 2 1992 hca 23, minister of state for the army v dalziel 1944 hca 4, national security act 1939 cth s 5, native title, western australia v ward.
This judgment ruled that the land title of indigenous peoples i. The queensland government had earlier tried to extinguish the meriam peoples property rights under the queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23 peter. The selden society 2016 lecture series continues with the hon margaret white ao on mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1. These six judgments in the mabo case comprise hundreds of pages, of which just three pages are shown here. The state of queensland,3 confirmed the existence of native title to lands occupied by the aboriginal peoples of australia.
The high court held that the doctrine of terra nullius, which imported all laws of england to a new land, did not apply in circumstances where there were already inhabitants present even if those inhabitants had been regarded at. The court, by a six to one majority, rejected the doctrine of terra 1. Mabo v queensland 1992 175 clr 1, 38 brennan j mabo. Mabo case home a brief outline of the mabo judgement and. On 3 june 1992, the high court of australia delivered mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23. The mabo case overview the mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius land belonging to noone on which british claims to possession of australia were based. The high courts use of the doctrine of precedent novelguide. Aboriginesconstitutional lawreal property aboriginesnative title to landwhether extinguished by annexation by crownreception of common law in australiaeffect on native titleterra nuliuswhether doctrine applicable in australia. One of the most basic human rights is the right to own property and. The recognition of native title by the full court of the high court of australia in mabo v queensland 3 june 1992 is an important development in the relationship between australias indigenous people and its european settlers.
Land reform, land rights eddie mabo 1936 1993 pictured above, left. The mabo cases are some of the most well known cases in the australian legal system, this paper will focus on the mabo v. The mabo case began when the plaintiffs, the merriam people of the murray islands in the torres strait initiated proceedings in the high court in 1982, in retort to the queensland amendment act 1982, which. The people and the law, area of study 1, the people and the australian constitution. To establish its long term consequences may require considerable litigation, or perhaps federal legislative interpreta tion. The common law construct of native title research online uow. Inquiry into the aboriginal and torres strait islander amendment a stronger land account bill 2014 page 3 human rights 7. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23, 1992. Pdf on jan 1, 2014, osayd ismael awawda and others published. This recognition inserted the legal doctrine of native title into australian law. Austlii website legislation native title act 1993 cth background on 20 may 1982, eddie koiki mabo, sam passi, david passi, celuia mapo salee and james rice. The mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius land belonging to noone on which british claims to. Federal governments discussion paper which outlines background to high courts decision on native title, consultation process, unresolved key issues.
The issue that started the court case was when mr mabo appealed for a permit from the queensland government to visit the island. National years 910 civics and citizenship education curriculum in relation to the theme of law and citizens years 1112 legal studies victoria unit 4. Atns agreements, treaties and negotiated settlements project. Mabo v queensland no 2 laws2381 property, equity and. Mabo v queensland overturning the doctrine of terra nullius. The queensland government introduced the queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985. Malcolm, the west australia, 25 june 1994, page 47, column 2. Queensland, as the case is formally known, refers to a judgment given by the high court on june 3, 1992. Mabo v queensland no 1, was a significant court case decided in the high court of australia on 8 december 1988.
William edward hanley stanner, white man got no dreaming 230 a. By joining the principles of brennan js approach with the justifications derived from his. The mabo case and its legacy the mabo case, or mabo v. The aborigines and torres strait islanders would be recognized as common law by. The 1992 mabo decision led to the native title act 1993 which created a framework that recognises aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples have rights to, and interests in, certain land because of their traditional laws and customs. The mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius land belonging to noone on which british claims to possession of australia were based. Detail from the cover of the mabo v queensland document. Mabo v queensland 1988 hca 69 166 clr 186 barnet jade.
Mabo v state of queensland no 2 22 september 2016 5. Take a look at the abcs coverage of the land rights decision and the man who campaigned for change. The mabo case began when the plaintiffs, the merriam people of the murray islands in the torres strait initiated proceedings in the high court in 1982, in retort to the queensland amendment act 1982, which established a system of making land grants on trust for aboriginals and torres strait islanders. The mabo decision is short for mabo vs queensland no 2 1992. You can filter on reading intentions from the list, as well as view them within your profile read the guide. He was born in 1936 on mer, which is also known as murray island, in the torres strait. The mabo decision, and the full text of the decision in mabo and others v. Kirby, in defence of mabo 1994 1 2 the reporter 19. The effective result of the judgement was to make irrelevant the declaration of terra nullius, or land belonging to noone which had been taken to occur from the commencement british colonisation in 1788, and to recognise a form of native title. It allows access to land for living, traditional purposes, hunting or fishing andor to teach laws and.
1 438 721 913 1141 1652 340 524 1086 1487 291 200 706 1315 1500 1170 909 1292 758 1649 547 73 724 314 282 1462 1211 1618 1375 1545 424 466 314 1439 1247 788 1463 1444 1285 1122